Which rhetorical device omits conjunctions between words, phrases, or clauses to create the effect of multiplicity?

Which rhetorical device omits conjunctions between words, phrases, or clauses to create the effect of multiplicity?

• A. DERIVATION
• B. ASYNDETON
• C. SENTENTIAL ADVERB
• D. ANTONYMS

Answer: (B)

Omitting conjunctions between words, phrases, or clauses to create a rapid, expansive feel is the device being tested. This technique, called asyndeton, makes a list sound brisk and cumulative, emphasizing multiplicity without slowing down the rhythm. Picture famous lines like “I came, I saw, I conquered”—the effect hinges on dropping the conjunctions to pile up ideas quickly. By contrast, the other terms refer to different ideas: derivation is about forming new words from existing ones, a sentential adverb is a word like “frankly” or “therefore” that modifies an entire sentence, and antonyms are words with opposite meanings. None of these capture the particular effect of leaving out conjunctions to stress a sense of many elements.

Omitting conjunctions between words, phrases, or clauses to create a rapid, expansive feel is the device being tested. This technique, called asyndeton, makes a list sound brisk and cumulative, emphasizing multiplicity without slowing down the rhythm. Picture famous lines like “I came, I saw, I conquered”—the effect hinges on dropping the conjunctions to pile up ideas quickly. By contrast, the other terms refer to different ideas: derivation is about forming new words from existing ones, a sentential adverb is a word like “frankly” or “therefore” that modifies an entire sentence, and antonyms are words with opposite meanings. None of these capture the particular effect of leaving out conjunctions to stress a sense of many elements.